Background: Why the Section 301 Investigation Was Launched
In April 2024, five U.S. labor unions petitioned the USTR to investigate alleged unfair trade practices by China in the shipbuilding, maritime, and logistics sectors.
By February 2025, the USTR found that China’s state-supported shipbuilding initiatives posed a burden to U.S. commerce, making these practices actionable under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Key Proposed Tariffs and Fees on Chinese-Built or Operated Vessels
As of early 2025, the USTR proposed several retaliatory measures, including port entry tariffs and service fees based on vessel build origin, ownership, and operator exposure:
- $1.5 million per U.S. port call for vessels built in China
- $1 million per port call for vessels operated by Chinese maritime companies
- $500,000–$1 million port call fees for operators with fleets composed of 25% to 50%+ Chinese-built vessels
- Additional penalties tied to future shipbuilding contracts with Chinese yards
The public comment period closed March 24, with hearings held March 24–26, 2025.
Industry Response: Divided Views and Ongoing Questions
Stakeholder responses have been mixed, with concerns centering around:
- Domestic Industry Support: Some see the proposal as necessary for restoring U.S. shipbuilding competitiveness
- Cost Impact: Others caution that these tariffs could increase shipping costs and strain global supply chains
- Contractual Clarity: Questions remain about fee enforcement, applicability to existing fixtures, and legal risk in canceling newbuild contracts
Potential Implications for Maritime Operators and Charterers
If enacted, these measures could have a wide-ranging effect on commercial, operational, and legal strategies in the maritime sector.
1. Operational Costs:
Port call fees could drastically reduce voyage profitability for fleets with high exposure to Chinese-built tankers or bulkers.
2. Strategic Fleet Planning:
Shipping companies may begin reassessing newbuilding strategies, looking at South Korea or Japan for future deliveries.
3. Charterparty Exposure:
Depending on contract terms, charterers could be liable for pass-through costs or may need to renegotiate existing agreements.
4. Compliance Complexity:
Operators may be required to prove fleet composition and adjust port rotation strategies to avoid or reduce exposure.
How Haugen Consulting Can Help
Haugen Consulting does not take a policy position on the Section 301 proposal. Instead, our focus is on helping maritime stakeholders prepare for any outcome with scenario-based commercial strategies. Our services include:
- Charterparty and COA audits to identify fee pass-through or exposure gaps
- Fleet analysis by country of build and operator
- Support for renegotiating terms or structuring fallback clauses
- Operational and financial modeling to evaluate tariff impacts under multiple scenarios
Next Steps: Evaluate Your Risk Before the Policy Takes Effect
If your company relies on Chinese-built vessels or has existing relationships with Chinese operators or shipyards, now is the time to evaluate your risk profile. Even without a finalized policy, preparing a response strategy gives you a competitive and financial edge.
Contact Haugen Consulting to develop a plan that preserves commercial agility and protects your margins in a shifting regulatory environment.
Email:
Schedule a consultation
